Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Economy, trade, and companies
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
|Should the Zodiac Seats U.S. article be renamed to Safran Seats? Please post at the Requested move 4 December 2018 section above. Please leave this in place, as I am trying to get more feedback. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:28, 9 December 2018 (UTC)|
|Should Fundinguniverse.com be removed and blacklisted on questionable copyright and as self-published tertiary source of International Directory of Company Histories. Matthew hk (talk) 23:12, 1 December 2018 (UTC)|
|Should the second vote section be removed? The Vintage Feminist (talk) 09:52, 30 November 2018 (UTC)|
|As this discussion is rapidly spinning out of control (witness multiple sections being opened on the same topic and attempts to centralize the discussion being reverted), it appears a more formal (and widely publicized) solution is in order.|
The question is:
What if anything should we include at this time on the "Nazi salute controversy"?
It's also fairly clear we have four choices:
Please indicate your preferences in order from the one that most suits your position to the least suitable, along with your arguments.
|I appears to me that the most accurate way to describe the business this company does is a pawnbroker and I have added this link a few times to this article. It is a clear from some of the references that the company does not like this term and there have been a number of attempts to remove this from the lead. It may be this is from users that have connection to the company. To make sure we keep a WP:NPOV it would be good other Wikipedia editors could comment on whether this term describes this business and is fair in this context. Sargdub (talk) 19:29, 24 January 2016 (UTC)|